Massive Multiplayer Editing Game
So far I have contributed only two short items. One is on a thing I somewhat like while the other is on a thing I somewhat dislike but both were I think deserving of inclusion. Interestingly the former has been improved by other players while the latter has been left as is - what does this say of the relative worth accorded these two topics by the players of this game?
Okay this seems a silly thing to report on but I have had lots of things occupying my interest lately and have chosen the one topic that lent itself most to a short and pithy post. Sorry for taking such a quick dip in the waters of the 'blogsphere' but I gotta get back to life now.
And another thing...
Most players on Wikipedia play nice. I see something that needs changing and I change it in a way that preserves the intent of the last player. They may come back and make a further modification but once more with what I had to contribute in mind. But there also seem to be some who just brutally alter things in the most provocative manner.
I noted that the Wikipedia entry on the Evanescence album The Open Door only credited the core band members rather than all the guest musicians acknowledged in the album sleeve notes. So I fixed it. But then at some later date I discovered that someone had reverted to just the band. What! Do they think that the music on that album could possibly be produced by a conventional band and neglect all the programming and orchestral textures? The decks are as key to that music as are guitars. I wonder what state the list will be in today...
Labels: Internet Observations